On 7/3/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok, I modified fixed version on lot of issues.

Can you check if you're agree?

CONTINUUM-1226 please, this one is really show stopper.

Stéphane


Emmanuel

Brett Porter a écrit :
>
> On 03/07/2007, at 5:54 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Jesse McConnell a écrit :
>>> Just to capture some talk on irc today...
>>> I think the strategy moving forward is going to be get some of jira
>>> cleaned up a la the recent maven jira push and continuum 1.1 is going
>>> to get wrapped up a bit for the first feature complete beta release
>>> very soon.
>>
>> I'll start to move some issues tomorrow.
>> Versions will be 1.1-beta-1, 1.1, 1.x and maybe 2.X
>
> I'd go with:
> - 1.1-beta-1
> - 1.1-beta-2 (I think we'll need at least this one, any beyond that we
> can add later)
> - 1.1
> - 1.1.x (bugs that we accept won't be fixed in 1.1, but will be
> addressed before any feature releases)
> - Future.
>
> 1.1 should be empty or have very few bugs so that it's not a lot of
> changes happening close to release.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
>
>




--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
you suck" -- S.Yegge

Reply via email to