"Brian E. Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Take a look at the maven-archetypeng-plugin (currently in mojo/sandbox) in > the plugin piece you will see the lifecycles. >
Thanks for the pointer. As already said, the net conclusion is that one can define its own lifecycle, with mojo bindings as she sees fit, so long as the phases are named after one of the phases in the clean/build/site lifecycles. Am I right ? BTW, I don't think this is really a problem: One can always decide that he will do jarring of a bunch of sources in the compile phase or whatever. Phases are just names. It would be nice to be able to change the displayed name, but this is merely some cosmetic enhancement. Regards. -- OQube < software engineering \ génie logiciel > Arnaud Bailly, Dr. \web> http://www.oqube.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
