Sounds ok to me. We'll import to the sandbox anyway and make sure we are essentially read to cut a first release before we replace the trunk. It would make sense to make this a new version of the archetype and make the current one a separate branch if needed.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Sanchez Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:38 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Status of Archetype? I'd like to release a 1.0-alpha-5 of the plugin before the other code comes in to get some bugfixes out is there a requirement to release all modules or just the plugin is ok? I'll call a vote later today On 8/22/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 22/08/2007, at 11:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > Brian and I are teaming up with Raphaël to get everything moved > > over. Brian wants to learn the IP clearance part, and is helping > > Raphaël with some code and testing, and then any of the code > > movement I will take care of. > > > > I was going to put the code into a branch, where did the sandbox > > requirement come from? > > I was just copying what John did so successfully for the patch > plugin. Archetype is a whole module, so a branch makes sense too. > > > > > So between the three us of Brian, Raphaël, and myself we are covered. > > Cool. > > - Brett > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
