On 19/10/2007, at 4:24 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
No jira.
ok... as you can see I'm trying to get in the habit of creating them
even for simple things to make sure we keep track...
This is only a squelching of an overactive process to be more sane.
It falls into the performance detrimental bucket.
As for unit tests, there are 2 that I'm aware of that test for this
situation already.
Sorry, I'm a bit confused - your commit log said "correcting logic" -
in which case the tests for that situation should have been failing
before the logic change fixed the problem.
Or is it just that the logic change was to write the metadata changes
less often but with the same information, hence the performance
detrimental aspect?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
