It's not header only. I think we actually need a general discussion around upgrading all the libraries mesos depends upon (Using a plain up-stream boost, etc).
Note that some portions of stout already require callers to link against specific libraries for them to actually work, so I don't think the header-only is that big of a requirement. But definitely we should have a discussion around it. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it header only? > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Alexander Rojas <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > > > I was checking one of my reviews which call for using some unimplemented > > functionality in stout path. Since that class has no methods, attributes > or > > anything apart from a string value attribute; I was left wondering, > wether > > it makes sense to use boost filesystem. > > > > Boost filesystem v3 has all the functionality we may need from a path > > class, it is the basis fro a technical recommendation ( > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4100.pdf < > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4100.pdf>) and > > might become part of the standard in the future. Why not adopt it in > mesos? > > > > Alexander >
