Hi, Erik. I find the problem. The mesos-0.22.1.tar.gz(
http://apache.cs.utah.edu/mesos/0.22.1/mesos-0.22.1.tar.gz) you provide
have problems. Please download it from here(
https://github.com/apache/mesos/archive/0.22.1.tar.gz). I could build it
with correct rpath.

On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 10:23 PM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote:

> The problem seems libtool generate in build directory are different. The
> libtool mesos-0.22.1 used would append /usr/lib64 when link libmesos.so. If
> copy the libtool which generate under mesos master branch, would not
> contains /usr/lib64 when link.
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:03 PM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Erik. I use 0.22.1 to build libmesos.so, could reproduce your
>> problem. But use master branch, could not reproduce.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Erik Weathers <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI, here's how I'm doing the build:
>>> https://gist.github.com/erikdw/67db1eaeeeec4fb1ede8
>>>
>>> I included the RPM list on the VM.
>>>
>>> - Erik
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Erik Weathers <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks for bearing with me Haosong.
>>> >
>>> > No environment variable mucking with it that I can see.  Only
>>> potentially
>>> > relevant thing is perhaps the LD_LIBRARY_PATH set by "scl":
>>> >
>>> >
>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib64:/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib
>>> >
>>> > Regarding package versions, we are identical for those:
>>> > automake-1.11.1-4.el6.noarch
>>> > autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch
>>> > libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64
>>> >
>>> > Are you using scl with devtool-set2?
>>> >
>>> > I feel like the original suggestion you had won't yield different
>>> behavior
>>> > than my original LDFLAGS setting.  i.e., my belief is that
>>> "-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib"
>>> > is identical to "-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib".  I'm guessing these are
>>> just
>>> > syntax variants.
>>> >
>>> > It's worth reemphasizing that the mesos-slave, mesos-master, etc.
>>> binaries
>>> > have the RPATH set as I expect (the --prefix setting is sufficient for
>>> that
>>> > it).
>>> >
>>> > - Erik
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:24 PM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> My autotool version:
>>> >> automake-1.11.1-4.el6.noarch
>>> >> autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch
>>> >> libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 2:23 PM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > I also use CentOS 6.5.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 2:20 PM, haosdent <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Does any exists environment variables affect your build?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Erik Weathers <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> Thanks for the response Hao.  Unfortunately that didn't work for
>>> me,
>>> >> the
>>> >> >>> default /usr/lib64 is inserted anyways.
>>> >> >>> I'm building on CentOS 6.5, using the instructions for CentOS 6.6
>>> >> here:
>>> >> >>> http://mesos.apache.org/gettingstarted/
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> - Erik
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 10:08 PM, haosdent <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> > Hi, @Erik I think you need to change
>>> "-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib" to
>>> >> >>> > "-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib". My build step:
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > ```
>>> >> >>> > LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib" ../configure
>>> >> >>> > ```
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > And the result show the RPATH only contains /usr/local/lib
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > ```
>>> >> >>> > $objdump -x ./src/.libs/libmesos.so |grep RPATH
>>> >> >>> >   RPATH                /usr/local/lib
>>> >> >>> > ```
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Erik Weathers <
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > wrote:
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > > hi mesos dev people,
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > > I'm hoping to enlist some help in building mesos such that the
>>> >> >>> > libmesos.so
>>> >> >>> > > has its RPATH set as our environment expects.  Specifically,
>>> in
>>> >> our
>>> >> >>> > > environment we install our own custom-built libraries under
>>> >> >>> > /usr/local/lib,
>>> >> >>> > > so I want the RPATH in the libmesos.so ELF to look like so:
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > >    Library rpath: [/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib64]
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > > I've tried to effect this change by running configure like so:
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > >    LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib" ./configure
>>> >> >>> --prefix=/usr/local
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > > This resulted in the following RPATH being embedded in
>>> >> libmesos.so:
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > >    Library rpath: [/usr/lib64:/usr/local/lib]
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > > The RPATH *does* have /usr/local/lib, but I want that to be
>>> the
>>> >> 1st
>>> >> >>> > entry,
>>> >> >>> > > not the 2nd.  I'm not familiar enough with autoconf nor
>>> libtool to
>>> >> >>> figure
>>> >> >>> > > out how to get the order reversed.  I *could* hack the
>>> embedded
>>> >> RPATH
>>> >> >>> > with
>>> >> >>> > > the chrpath tool, but I'd prefer changing build arguments
>>> instead.
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > > I see in the g++ cmd that generates the .so that there are
>>> >> includes
>>> >> >>> of
>>> >> >>> > > /usr/lib64 earlier than my passed LDFLAGS, so I wonder if
>>> it's a
>>> >> >>> > > configure.ac change I need to make to allow the LDFLAGS to be
>>> >> >>> shoved in
>>> >> >>> > > front instead of behind the automatically generated /usr/lib64
>>> >> >>> portion.
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > > Notably, simple use of the --prefix=/usr/local option allows
>>> the
>>> >> >>> mesos-*
>>> >> >>> > > binaries to have the embedded RPATH as I want, I'm only
>>> struggling
>>> >> >>> with
>>> >> >>> > the
>>> >> >>> > > libmesos.so RPATH.
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > > Thanks for whatever help you might provide!
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > > - Erik
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> > > P.S., this is for building mesos-0.22.1
>>> >> >>> > > P.P.S., I tried --with-rpath=/usr/local/lib, but that didn't
>>> help
>>> >> >>> either.
>>> >> >>> > >
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > --
>>> >> >>> > Best Regards,
>>> >> >>> > Haosdent Huang
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> --
>>> >> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> >> Haosdent Huang
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Best Regards,
>>> >> > Haosdent Huang
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> Haosdent Huang
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Haosdent Huang
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Haosdent Huang
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Haosdent Huang

Reply via email to