> On Feb 11, 2016, at 2:14 PM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]> wrote: > > What do you mean by keeping the old symbols?
I mean, will there be a period where you keep the old names as well as the new names? > For example, in the case of the `Allocator::addSlave()`, are you suggesting > that when we add `Allocator::addAgent()`, we keep `Allocator::addSlave()` > as well? Master will only call `Allocator::addAgent()` from that point > onward, so I'm not sure what's the value of keeping the > `Allocator::addSlave()`? Any allocator modules have to be recompiled anyway > with the new interface right? > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, James Peach <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> On Feb 9, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Diana J Arroyo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello Everyone, >>> >>> The initial proposal for the slave to agent rename has been added to the >>> Epic JIRA item: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1478 for >> your >>> review. The link to the proposal working document is posted in the >>> description of the JIRA item. Your comments/feedback would be greatly >>> appreciated. >> >> Looking at the list in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3777, >> are you introducing new symbols and keeping the old ones for a while? >> >> J
