So, the question is about copying the JavaDocs from the RI's jsf-api.jar file, but not the code? I'm gonna have to ask what the precise rules are and get back to you on that.
Craig On 7/21/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, that was the answer to the other proposal ;-) > > For the JavaDoc stuff, le'ts hear what Craig can tell us... > > Bruno > > 2005/7/21, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > +1 > > > > For me it is better to introduce a new dependency if we can create > > better tests (and faster) than using nasty workarounds... > > > > Bruno > > > > 2005/7/21, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Is there an issue with copying the javadoc from the spec classes? I > > > remember someone said we could not use the jsf-api.jar file a long > > > time ago but the java doc is part of the spec. We should be able to > > > copy that correct? So I'd like to propose that as I'm adding tests to > > > the javax.faces.* packages that I also add javadoc to these classes. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > TTFN, > > > > > > -bd- > > > > > >
