Yeah you don't even need Cactus for that kind of test ;-)
On 9/27/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was hoping you would not notice that :-) > > -bd- > > On Sep 27, 2005, at 4:41 PM, sean schofield (JIRA) wrote: > > > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-623? > > page=comments#action_12330649 ] > > > > sean schofield commented on MYFACES-623: > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > Yes your new test case seems to do the trick. The problem with the > > original was that you were comparing the int value of the Integer > > you just created to 14. You weren't checking the actual result of > > the getValue. > > > > > >> setValue() method of ValueBindingImpl does not behave properly > >> -------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Key: MYFACES-623 > >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-623 > >> Project: MyFaces > >> Type: Bug > >> Components: JSR-127 > >> Versions: 1.1.0 > >> Reporter: sean schofield > >> Attachments: MYFACES-623.patch > >> > >> According to section 5.1.4 of the specification (p. 5-4) ... > >> If you have #{expr-a[value-b]} where value-a is a Map then ... > >> call value-a.put(value-b, newValue). > >> The MyFaces implementation is coercing newValue into String which > >> is incorrect behavior. > >> NOTE: I discovered the problem while using a bean that was > >> programatically added to the session map. So there is is no class > >> defined in faces-config.xml. I don't think this should matter but > >> I thought I would mention it. > >> > > > > -- > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > - > > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the > > administrators: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa > > - > > For more information on JIRA, see: > > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > > > >
