graphicImageDynamic sounds good to me.
2005/9/29, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Don't you think graphicImageDynamic in better then, as when you use auto
> completion in your IDE, you clearly have the choice between the 2 ?
> The download tag could then be downloadDynamic ?
>
>
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 15:49 +0200, Mathias Brökelmann wrote:
> I would prefer dynamicGraphicImage.
>
> 2005/9/29, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I just would like to settle on this, as the earlier we do the rename, the
> > easiest it'll be.
> >
> > Any opinion on those graphicImageBytes & downloadBytes names ?
> > Any better proposal ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sylvain.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 13:09 -0400, Sylvain Vieujot wrote:
> >
> > I like the fact that it starts like the standard graphicImage component,
> > but the Dynamic part is good to.
> > What about graphicImageDynamic?
> > A bite long though
> >
> > Or maybe graphicImageBytes, which would be consistent with a downloadBytes
> > tag ?
> >
> > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 08:49 -0400, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > How about something like dynaImage?
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 9/28/05, Mathias Brökelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Great! We definitely need a component to render dynamic images.
> > >
> > > I took a view into the code and saw that the state is appended to the
> > > image url. IMO it will not work in every case since the state could be
> > > very large and as far as I know there is a limitation around 1024
> > > chars in a request url.
> > >
> > > The other thing is the phase listener which will not work if the
> > > component is used in a uidata component. Try using a custom faces
> > > event which is queued through UIComponent.queueEvent(...).
> > >
> > >
> > > 2005/9/28, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > I just committed a first working version of a graphicImage component
> > that
> > > > displays the images from bytes, and that doesn't need an additional
> > servlet.
> > > >
> > > > It works, but there is still work to be done (See the TODOs in the
> > > > component's java file).
> > > >
> > > > The most important things are :
> > > > 1) Find a good name for this component. Right now, it says Ajax
> whereas
> > > > it's not really Ajax.
> > > > 2) Extend it to make download links (uses an <a> instead of an <img>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your ideas,
> > > >
> > > > Sylvain.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 12:35 -0400, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > > > Sylvain,
> > > >
> > > > I'm definitely interested in a component that can display an image
> > > > from bytes as well, if you want any assistance.
> > > >
> > > > "-- need a dynamic image servlet" is the next item on my todo list :)
> > > >
> > > > On 9/26/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Yes, you're right, but I was looking for a way to use the same code
> > with a
> > > > > get request instead of a post request.
> > > > > So, I think this will work.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll post this soon so that you can check it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sylvain.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 23:24 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > > > > The snippet you posted is just about remembering the state of the
> > > > > application client side - it doesn't have to do anything with
> dynamic
> > > > > loading of images...
> > > > >
> > > > > Or do I get you completely wrong?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/26/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > You're right, Ajax isn't the perfect term for this, as the result
> > won't
> > > > be
> > > > > > XML.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But maybe it can work using something similar to that :
> > > > > > " callback: function(element,entry) {return
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> entry+'&jsf_tree_64='+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('jsf_tree_64').value)+'&jsf_state_64='+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('jsf_state_64').value)+'&jsf_viewid='+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('jsf_viewid').value)}"
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (extracted from the inputSuggestAjax code).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the clue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sylvain.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 16:27 -0400, Matt Blum wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The XMLHttpRequest object (or the equivalent ActiveX control)'s
> open
> > > > > method
> > > > > > takes as its first argument the request method you want to use. So
> > you
> > > > > > could make a get request simply by saying:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > xHR.open("GET", url[, asyncflag][, username][, password]);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe that answers your question, but I'm not sure I
> understand
> > how
> > > > > > that helps you. I mean, AJAX will return a text string, and
> possibly
> > a
> > > > > > document object if the response is valid XML. It won't return an
> > image.
> > > > > > The only way to load an image is, as you say, using the src
> property
> > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > image object, and that will always do a GET. I don't see how you
> get
> > > > AJAX
> > > > > > to work into this scenario, unless you plan to use it to generate
> > the
> > > > URL
> > > > > > for the image object to load.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or am I just missing something in your original message?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/26/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm trying to make a new component that would display an image,
> but
> > > > > without
> > > > > > the need to have a dedicated servlet.
> > > > > > It would make applications that use images from a lot of different
> > > > sources
> > > > > > (i.e. servlets) much simpler.
> > > > > > Basically, it would be a component like :
> > > > > > <x:graphicImageAjax getBytesMethod="#{myBean.imageBytes}"/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As the only way I found to load an image in javascript is
> > > > image.src="...",
> > > > > > I can't use a post request.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does someone know a way either to load an image in javascript with
> > the
> > > > > > result of a post request, or a way to use ajax like in
> > inputSuggestAjax,
> > > > > but
> > > > > > with a get url ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sylvain.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Trainings in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mathias
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Mathias
>
>
--
Mathias
