Would be even better. If you come up with a working solution, I'd be more than happy ;)
regards, martin On 10/24/05, Travis Reeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder if we should change this to use DOM updating rather than the > innerHTML so we don't have to hack around IE's limitations and can probably > have more flexibility like only updating a particular column. > > Travis > > > On 10/24/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The thing is that the resource bundle (the f:loadBundle tag) is not > > processed on an AJAX postback. The f:loadBundle is pure JSP and is > > only processed in the rendering phase - the rendering phase is not > > executed but for the ajax-enabled data table. > > > > So what you need to do is to have a managed bean providing the > > resources instead of the f:bundle Tag - you can still access a > > properties file in the background. > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > On 10/24/05, Travis Reeder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So I figured out why Internet explorer errors on the > AutoUpdateDataTable, > > > some reference here: > > > > > > > http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails-spinoffs/2005-September/000894.html > > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/properties/innerhtml.asp > > > > > > So I've tried wrapping it in a <div> and updating the whole table and > it > > > works now, but on the ajax update the column header value is blank. > Before > > > trying to debug this one, does anyone (Martin or whoever has been doing > the > > > Ajax stuff) have any idea why this might be. > > > > > > Travis > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Trainings in English and German > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Trainings in English and German
