[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1029?page=comments#action_12362772 ]
Simon Kitching commented on MYFACES-1029: ----------------------------------------- While MyFaces should try to be reasonably compatible with the RI for user convenience, I don't think it's necessary to slavishly follow bad decisions in the RI. In this case, I'd be in favour of the patch that throws an exception; two JSP tags with the same id is just wrong, and for me an exception seems the correct action to take. > Duplicate sibling ids allowed > ----------------------------- > > Key: MYFACES-1029 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1029 > Project: MyFaces > Type: Bug > Components: Implementation > Versions: Nightly > Reporter: Dennis Byrne > Assignee: Bruno Aranda > Priority: Minor > Fix For: Nightly > Attachments: lower_impact_patch.txt, patch.txt > > MyFaces will let you do this (same ids, renders two trees): > <t:tree id="tree" value="#{treeModel}" > styleClass="tree" > nodeClass="treenode" > selectedNodeClass="treenodeSelected" > expandRoot="true"> > </t:tree> > <h:outputText id="tree" value="This text will not be rendered" /> > See my comments in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1020 for an > explanation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
