>From my tests comparing client and server state, I must say client-state will not even scale to medium traffic...
The performance hit with client state was horrendous. processing time was up to 5 times higher than with server-state. And the memory footprint was not significantly lower. We should be able to answer questions in that area as soon as we have a demo-application that we can load-test... regards Alexander > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Werner Punz > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Was someone looking for a public high traffic site? > > Martin Marinschek schrieb: > > Do you have one, Travis? > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > Question is, can myfaces really scale to high traffic (it definitely > from low to medium traffic) > > the reason for my question is, as Hookoom has pointed out, > that you cannot use client side state saving on such sites due to the > fact that many people accessing those do not have broadband, > and server > side state saving adds a lot of burden to the session due to exsessive > state saving even in components which basically do not need it. > > Well not really a question, you can solve all those things with more > cluster servers, but the question is more how much more overhead would > it be in JSF than compared to stateless frameworks, I guess. > >
