If you put stuff like this in the impl proper, you give people a false impression of security - which is not good.
regards, Martin On 3/9/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes and the DummyForm feature *can* be used with any JSF impl - at > least theoretically ;-). But if people want to use this feature (ie. > having commandlinks without an enclosing form) they should do so by > relying on tomahawk not on the myfaces impl. > > Manfred > > > On 3/9/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/9/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In general terms, > > > > > > If a feature of MyFaces can be implemented in a JSF-independent way, > > > put it in tomahawk so everyone can take advantage of it. > > > > > > If a feature of MyFaces requires special code in impl so that it > > > cannot be used elsewhere, then it should be configurable, and the > > > feature should probably be disabled by default. > > > > > > However, we shouldn't dump a potential feature just because it's only > > > usable in our implementation. > > > > Oops. Hit submit too soon... > > > > ...And we also shouldn't put an impl feature in tomahawk unless it's > > something that can be used with any JSF implementation. Such > > impl-dependent features should stay in impl. > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
