I have very mixed emotions about rushing into any standards here,
de-facto or otherwise. There's a lot of different ideas here,
and I don't want to latch into any one just yet. Let's
take our time to get this right.
-- Adam
On 3/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> saveBean stuff seems pretty straight forward, I'm for adding this to the spec
> with the same rules as StateHolders and storing it within the attribute map
> of the UIViewRoot.
>
> // pseudo
> if (obj instanceof StateHolder) {
> } else if (obj instanceof Serializable) {
> } else { throw new FacesException(...) };
>
>
> To some extent, I think Seam is doing something like this, but transparently
> and specific to that framework, but the advantage is obviously there.
>
>
>
> >I get this error when I click on either link. This happens even
> >after I log in... (mkienenb2 if it matters).
> >
> >http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=692386
> >http://forum.java.sun.com/forum.jspa?forumID=530
> >
> >Error: you do not have permission to view the requested forum or category.
> >
> >
> >On 3/9/06, Ed Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> As you know, JSF 1.2 is fast drawing to a close and the scope is such
> >> that we can't get any new big features in.
> >>
> >> However, Sun's and Apache's JSF 1.1 impls are open source, so there is
> >> room for us to make defacto standards if both of us provide the same
> >> interface to the user.
> >>
> >> One thing I wanted to include in JSF 1.2 is a "flash" scope as shown in
> >> my blog entry [1].
> >>
> >> Is anyone here interested in doing this sort of thing?
> >>
> >> Ed
> >>
> >> [1]
> >http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2005/12/bringing_ruby_o.html
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
> >> | homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
> >> | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> | 46 Business Days until JavaOne SF 2006
> >>
> >>
>
