I'm definitely +1 for fixing these dependencies for the reasons that Mike and Craig gave. Maybe we can each change a few of them?
For now lets just change things in the trunk since we're trying to get the tomahawk release finished. Sean On 3/28/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/28/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't get a co right now at my day job, so I can't verify this. If you > > make that change I am guessing sandbox wouldn't compile w/out also moving > > the "not found" class from impl to a project where sandbox could see it. > > Maybe shared, or maybe sandbox itself if there are no other uses for this > > class. > > Yes, it seems to be working. I just wasn't sure if there was more to > it than that. > > In this particular case, it was easy enough to change the Exception to > a FacesException. > > > > I wouldn't be suprised if there are all sorts of other problems that have > > crept in because of this. > > Oh, yeah. There's a ton of problems to fix. I'm trying to > enumerate them all so I can open an issue on them. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-220 >
