On 4/18/06, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reading that link and under those rules, I would think that you cannot > include any jar that included any JavaScript or XML; they would count as > non-binary/source. I haven't looked at facelets closely (because of the > CDDL license), but I would assume that it includes some XML > configuration for the standard JSF components. Linking to it with Maven > might be a different story.
I don't think Facelets includes any javascript . The facelets xml configuration files are not executable content. They don't do anything. They just associate tags and classes. And they're only included in binary form in any case(1). -Mike (1)This isn't the place to discuss the legal details, but my take is that a jar file would count as a "binary form" and could thus contain javascript. Fortunately, it's a moot point in this case -- take it up on legal discuss if you're interested in getting an authoritative ruling and have an actual use case.
