I should mention that TC 6 Jasper was implemented with the unified EL to a point where the RI 1.2 demos ran fine and development of .tag files with the new EL also worked with JSF 1.2


Stan Silvert wrote:
Most of what I did relies on Unified EL.  In fact, the EL integration is
completely done except that the components haven't been converted to use
it.  The components still work though because I also did all the
backward-compatibility stuff for 1.1 style components. Almost all of the new API's rely on Unified EL at least indirectly.
I see nothing to be gained by having a TC 5 / 1.2 branch.  I really
don't see what the point would be.  Maybe I missed something earlier in
the thread.

I also don't understand why you need a TC 6 release to do 1.2
development.  I've been working with JSF 1.2 stuff on TC 6 for a few
months now.  It works fine for development purposes.

That being said, I'm fine with whatever you guys decide.  Just let me
know when/if you want the code.

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:02 PM
To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple SVN Branches (Was --> Re: JSF 1.2)

Maybe we should check in Stan's work and just remove the TC 6 stuff.
I can't imagine he did a lot with the EL or content interweaving but
maybe I am wrong.  I'm ok with checking in his stuff now and letting
you get started to strip away the TC 6 stuff.

Sean

On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, so that's what we ought to do - releasing a MILESTONE release
shouldn't be a problem.

regards,

Martin

On 5/25/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 5/25/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You'd better read the spec license again   A package that
implements
some of
the "javax.*" APIs from a spec needs to implement *all* of
them.
@ Craig: Is this different the the 1.1 spec license?  I seem to
recall
a compromise solution where we released as "milestone."  Is that
no
longer an option?
No, it's not different.  Milestone/EA/Alpha/Beta/etc. are fine (as
would be
nightly builds that are not formally a release).  Final/GA
releases
are not
fine.

Craig


--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces




--
--------------------------
Sent from my FrankenBerry Wireless Handheld

Reply via email to