Ah ok, I was seing the maven-* wherever I went, and I thought it was like the plugins, where everybody puts maven-name-plugin (even not being plugins from the maven project itself). But no problem, I will rechange once we agree in the names. Those seem fine to me :)
Bruno On 6/28/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To follow the conventions, I think we should rename the archetypes to: > > maven-archetype-myfaces > maven-archetype-jsfcomponents > > Then, update the poms and documentation. I am going to do this if no > one objects ;) I think the 'maven' at the front of the archetype name refers to the fact that Maven-the-project is distributing them, not that they are meant for use with Maven-the-build-tool. IMO they should by myfaces-archetype-[something]. myfaces-archetype-simple myfaces-archetype-components <--'jsf' is implicit in the 'myfaces' part, no? For example, the ones for Struts are struts-archetype-xxx . Thoughts? -- Wendy
