Ah ok, I was seing the maven-* wherever I went, and I thought it was
like the plugins, where everybody puts maven-name-plugin (even not
being plugins from the maven project itself). But no problem, I will
rechange  once we agree in the names. Those seem fine to me :)

Bruno

On 6/28/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> To follow the conventions, I think we should rename the archetypes to:
>
> maven-archetype-myfaces
> maven-archetype-jsfcomponents
>
> Then, update the poms and documentation. I am going to do this if no
> one objects ;)

I think the 'maven' at the front of the archetype name refers to the
fact that Maven-the-project is distributing them, not that they are
meant for use with Maven-the-build-tool.

IMO they should by myfaces-archetype-[something].

myfaces-archetype-simple
myfaces-archetype-components   <--'jsf' is implicit in the 'myfaces' part, no?

For example, the ones for Struts are struts-archetype-xxx .

Thoughts?
--
Wendy

Reply via email to