I see that the jsf_state || jsf_state_64 guys have disappeared from
the current 1.1 myfaces implementation and replaced by the
"javax.faces.ViewState", used by jsf 1.2, so I guess we can just
implement as pointer in the jsf 1.2 javadocs (the default impl just
checks for the "javax.faces.ViewState" param,

Bruno

On 10/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
no, I mean,

why not just abstract isPost() method and letting the impls deal with that?

best would be to check against view_param. ok, that disables jsf 1.1 from work
so looking for param_map size > 0 is ... ok.

so each impl can check against view_param (that's jsf 1.2) and! what
they did for jsf 1.1
the jsf_state || jsf_state_64 in case of myfaces and com,sun.xxxx in case of RI

I don't see why checking (inside the IMPL of myfaces) against
jsf_state || jsf_state_64 || jsf_view_param params will break jsf 1.2

Since we don't touch the API RespStMgr. guy.

-M


On 10/19/06, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know why it's like this either, but unfortunately the snipit
> defines a very clear behavior.  Breaking this contract will break thew
> 1.2 spec.
>
> Scott
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > to fast...  :)
> >
> > my question was, why not as abstract method and let the details to the
> > impl...
> >
> > and we need to *overhaul* this in htmlResp....
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On 10/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> does anyone know, why the spec says for RespStateMgr.isPostback()
> >>
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >> For backwards compatability with implementations of
> >> ResponseStateManager prior to JSF 1.2, a default implementation is
> >> provided that consults the ExternalContext's requestParameterMap and
> >> return true if its size is greater than 0.
> >> </snip>
> >>
> >> http://foo:port/myapp/random.faces?hack=me
> >>
> >>
> >> I think we need (for myfaces) to override the method in the
> >> htmlRespStMgr..
> >> to check against jsf_state || jsf_state_64 || jsf_view_param
> >>
> >> -M
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> >>
> >> further stuff:
> >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Reply via email to