Ah, I see! So it's safe to assume that, in a JSF 1.2 environment, all
implementations will work and not throw an UnsupportedOperationException
then. I thought it meant that this was an optional operation that wasn't
certain to succeed.
As for the other part, it's just that I dislike to create ValueExpression in
Java just to evaluate it right away. I guess I would have been forced to do
that if the above method was not guaranteed to work.
Regards,
~ Simon
On 8/23/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The idea is to avoid AbstractMethodErrors on pre-existing
> apps that happen to have a 1.1 Application implementation.
> You'd still get an UnsupportedErrorException. The
> Application implementation provided by a 1.2 implementation
> has to return a ResourceBundle (or throw an exception).
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "the correct way to
> access the bundle" - this is the programmatic way,
> in EL you'd use #{name}.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 8/23/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Reading the JAF 1.2 API I found the following:
> > getResourceBundle public java.util.ResourceBundle
> > getResourceBundle(FacesContext ctx,
> >
> > java.lang.String name)
> >
> >
> > Find a ResourceBundle as defined in the application configuration
> resources
> > under the specified name. If a ResourceBundle was defined for the name,
> > return an instance that uses the locale of the current UIViewRoot.
> >
> > The default implementation throws UnsupportedOperationException and is
> > provided for the sole purpose of not breaking existing applications that
> > extend this class.
> >
> > Returns:ResourceBundle for the current UIViewRoot, otherwise null
> Throws:
> > FacesException - if a bundle was defined, but not resolvable
> > java.lang.NullPointerException - if ctx == null || name == nullSince:1.2and
> > in MR 1:
> > getResourceBundle public java.util.ResourceBundle
> > getResourceBundle(FacesContext
> > ctx,
> > java.lang.String name)
> >
> >
> > Find a ResourceBundle as defined in the application configuration
> resources
> > under the specified name. If a ResourceBundle was defined for the name,
> > return an instance that uses the locale of the current UIViewRoot .
> >
> > The default implementation throws UnsupportedOperationException and is
> > provided for the sole purpose of not breaking existing applications that
> > extend this class.
> >
> > Returns:ResourceBundle for the current UIViewRoot, otherwise null
> Throws:
> > FacesException - if a bundle was defined, but not resolvable
> > java.lang.NullPointerException - if ctx == null || name == nullSince:1.2
> > Both are exactly the same. However, I wonder why the doc says the
> default
> > implementation provides that method only to not break existing
> applications
> > when JSF 1.1 did not even have that method... I really cannot figure
> that
> > one out. Can anyone enlighten me? Also, what is the correct way to
> access
> > the bundle if not that one? I hope it's not involve using the
> > ExpressionFactory with #{name} expression.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > ~ Simon
> >
> >
>
