That does not fully work, in Firefox at least (just tried it, the cursor still reverts to an I-Beam for input text boxes for example)
On 9/18/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's possible to set the cursor on the body node, would have to use a skin > property rather than a style property, but I'm not sure I like that. > > > On 9/18/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure a cursor will work. The cursor applies to the front-most > > element underneath the cursor. The only way, that I am aware of, to > > get a global cursor is to float (using absolute positioning and > > z-index) an HTML element (like a DIV) over the entire page. This is > > what the "blocking" functionality already does in Trinidad (I > > believe). > > > > So really, is it not the job of the programmer to ensure the PPR > > request is a blocking request and not the job of the status indicator > > to change the cursor? > > > > On 9/18/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hmm I don't think this should be directly in the indicator contract. If > it > > > is, then I think it should be a new "type" attribute on the status > indicator > > > with the following values: > > > > > > "icon": render default icons (default value) > > > "cursor": change the cursor on document level (requires a way to > specified > > > the busy and ready cursor though) > > > "facets": render busy and ready facets > > > > > > > > > On 9/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > one more, > > > > > > > > what about changing the cursor, when statusIndicator is busy ? > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > > On 9/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I think > > > > > > > > > > no facet => icon is rendered; > > > > > otherwise, no icon is rendered. > > > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > > > > On 9/18/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hmm not as simple as I though. Before pushing a patch let decide > on > > > the > > > > > > behavior for every use case: > > > > > > > > > > > > Both facets are specified and rendered --> Don't render any icon > > > > > > Both facets are specified but only one is rendered --> ? > > > > > > Both facets are specified but neither are rendered --> ? > > > > > > Only one facet is specified and rendered --> Don't render any > icon or > > > > > > render the icon of the missing facet? > > > > > > Only one facet is specified but not rendered --> ? > > > > > > No facet is specified --> Render both icons > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/18/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Or put tr:icon in the facet. Yeah, that sound good too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > that sounds like the best solution. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/18/07, Adam Winer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > IMO, if we have a facet, we don't render the icon. No need > > > > > > > > > for an attribute at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone that desperately needs both the facet and the icon > > > > > > > > > can render two statusIndicators. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/18/07, Simon Lessard < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Speaking of which, I forgot to add skin documentation. > I'll > > > do > > > > > > that right > > > > > > > > > > > away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would also like to add a new attribute to skip the > icon > > > > > > rendering. If it > > > > > > > > > > > hasn't been of backward compatibility, I would have > simply > > > removed > > > > > > them > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I added a demo usage of the facet's, I was thinking, that > it > > > > > > shouldn't > > > > > > > > > > render the "default" icon, > > > > > > > > > > glad you pointed it out now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since it's easily doable with a combination of facet and > > > tr:icon, > > > > > > but since > > > > > > > > > > > we had a release with the statusIndicator already, > that's > > > out of > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > So, what I need now is a decent attribute name. What do > you > > > think > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > "renderIcon" or "renderFacetsOnly"? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tend to like renderFacetsOnly, because that what you > added > > > where > > > > > > facets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps, we can change that soon, that when facet's are > > > specified, > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > don't render the "default" icon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > > > > > blog: > > > http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > > > blog: > http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
