Hi, +1 No problems in moving the existing code (for tomhawk facelets support) around. I am a bit reluctant to include Facelets as compile dependency for Tomahawk (to support facelets now in tomahawk we need to implement some tag handlers, hence the facelets library is necessary to compile). I guess Facelets could be marked as optional in the dependencies section.
Cheers, Bruno On 24/10/2007, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > > MyFacelets is a cute name, but it's going to be confusing and slow to > > read. Human brains work on pattern matching, and MyFacelets matches > > too closely to other names in the domain (MyFaces/Facelets). Aend iff > > youuu donnt thynk tahts turrue, yooo porabably kant reed thhis. > > MyFaces MyFaces MyFaces MyFacelets MyFaces MyFacelets Facelets > > MyFacelets MyFaces. > > > I can't see any difference to the rest of the text ...... cheers > <opening another bottle of beer *plop* /> > > ;-) > > > >
