On 12/6/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > to bring light to this discussion; > > On Oct 24, 2007 8:15 AM, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For me, a merger makes sense. > > > > The question is who will do the work, though. > > yup! That's right. > <snip/>
Moving house can't be all that much work in this case, if thats the consensus. I intend to be around. > > > > Some reflections on the modules: > > > > - ViewController/Dialog: I hope Orchestra can take in what makes sense > > here (the notion of subflows which > > I think the Orchestra VC is pretty solid, right now; I personally like it > more. > What potential makes sense (as an addition) is the Dialog mgr > + the XML-W3C-thing (forgot the name :-) ) > <snap/> SCXML (I suspect you'll only hear more about it, so it'll get easier to remember over time ;-) > > > It was discussed, that Shale should have a final release; > I am +1 on that. > <snip/> What do you have in mind, other than cutting the release? I may be able to help with the release (depends when etc.). v1.0.5 or v1.1.0 or both? > I am not sure, if all modules should really make it into MyFaces. > I can see interest in these Shale-modules: > -Dialog > -Remoting > -Test > -Tiger > -ViewController > > What happens to the rest? > I don't know; > Will they be maintained ? > I don't know; > <snap/> I intend to remain involved with the dialog modules, at the least. -Rahul
