I wouldn't argue if you guys wanted to move shale-test over though. :) The Bridge needs something similar to support testing of portlet JSF functionality. But that is a different story.Well, I made the mistake of talking about working on Shale Test @ JSFDays afew weeks ago, so I think you'll see more progress in that area...
Cool, yay.. Not only can the bridge use it for some testing, but I've
got a commons project I'd like to use it with. Not to mention Trinidad.
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set simon
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set Bruno Aranda
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set simon
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set Scott O'Bryan
- RE: JSF 2.0 component set Jesse Alexander (KSFH 323)
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set Scott O'Bryan
- RE: JSF 2.0 component set Kito D. Mann
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set Scott O'Bryan
- Re: JSF 2.0 component... Matthias Wessendorf
- RE: JSF 2.0 component... Kito D. Mann
- Re: JSF 2.0 component... Scott O'Bryan
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set Curtiss Howard
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set Scott O'Bryan
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set Michael Concini
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set Scott O'Bryan
- RE: JSF 2.0 component set Gary VanMatre
- RE: JSF 2.0 component set Kito D. Mann
- Re: JSF 2.0 component set Scott O'Bryan
- RE: shale-test location (was RE: J... Kito D. Mann
- Re: shale-test location (was R... Scott O'Bryan
- Re: shale-test location (was R... Scott O'Bryan
