On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gertjan van Oosten schrieb: > >> As quoted from Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>> [..] a lot of code now is generated to allow easy migration to 1.2. >>> Facelets support was added too, and required tag handler classes are >>> now inside tomahawk. >>> >>> >> >> Too bad the taglib descriptors in the 1.2 versions of the jars are still >> more or less empty: >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk12/1.1.7-SNAPSHOT/ >> >> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk-sandbox12/1.1.7-SNAPSHOT/ >> [both from today] >> >> The taglib descriptors are wrong: >> >> % jar tvf tomahawk12-1.1.7-SNAPSHOT.jar | grep 'META-INF/.*taglib.xml' >> 1274 Thu Sep 04 05:09:22 CEST 2008 META-INF/tomahawk.taglib.xml >> % jar tvf tomahawk-sandbox12-1.1.7-SNAPSHOT.jar | grep >> 'META-INF/.*taglib.xml' >> 1273 Thu Sep 04 05:16:54 CEST 2008 META-INF/sandbox.taglib.xml >> >> This will need to be corrected! >> >> > > Those names look ok to me. An app will use either tomahawk.jar *or* > tomahawk12.jar; the two are mutually exclusive and provide the same > components (just optimised for different environments). So it seems sensible > to me that they use the same taglib name. > > The files are completely empty of component declarations though, which will > indeed be a tiny wee problem :-). > > There was a typo error on the pom.xml of 1.2 branch (the modelId on tomahawk core12 is tomahawk12). I have committed the solution. Thanks for the help on find this. regards Leonardo Uribe
