Hi,
Vote was closed by 2009-04-27 09:55 a.m. Final results of the vote:
[1] +3, 1 veto
[2] +1, 3 vetoes
[3] +0, 3 vetoes
[4] +1, 0 vetoes
Thus, no consensus has been reached by this vote. This is, what the
decision making process on
http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making
prescribes:
>>The rules require that a negative vote includes an alternative
proposal
or a detailed explanation of the reasons for the negative vote. The
community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative proposal
that
resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the concerns
leading to
the negative vote can be addressed.
This process is called "consensus gathering" and we consider it a very
important indication of a healthy community.<<
So, as everybody has given alternative proposals, all vetoers are
asked to
give detailed explanations for their negative votes to enable consensus
gathering. My personal observation is that everybody was pretty fast
with
emitting vetoes making me feel I'm at the UNO security council :-)
Imho and
though I can't emit a binding vote solutions [1] to [3] all aren't
that bad.
Maybe everybody who emitted a veto could consider weakening it to a
+0 thus
opening the path for a majority decision?
Best Regards,
Ganesh
Ganesh schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> We are trying to agree on a way to include the optimization options
pps:true/false, queuesize:n, errorlevel:WARNING/ERROR/NONE for JSF 2.0
Javascript with the MyFaces JSF 2.0 implementation.
> We've got 4 different proposed solutions, each has been checked for
technical feasability:
>
> 1.) extra options packed in a new t:ajax tag and
myfaces.ajax.request
> 2.) optimization options as attributes of f:ajax
> 3.) optimization options within f:attributes nested in f:ajax
> 4.) a separate taglibrary with a single tag mf:ajax included with
the
core
> Please consider the solutions and vote! See previous mails on
this list
with "f:ajax and MyFaces extensions" in the subject for further
details.
>
> Please note:
> This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1
votes. This
is a code modification vote [1], so you can veto a solution with a
vote of
-1. Please vote whole numbers. You can give a vote on each of the 4
solutions. E.g. you can vote:
>
> 1.) +1
> 2.) +1
> 3.) +0
> 4.) -1
>
> The vote lasts for 72 hours. It start on 2009-04-24 9:55 a.m. and
ends
on 2009-04-27 09:55 a.m.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 - you favourize this solution
> [ ] +0 - you don't like this solution
> [ ] -1 - you veto this solution
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Ganesh Jung
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
