Rc1-rc1 doesn’t make sense at all and is confusing. It still was confusing for 
People for beta-rc1. There is no beta-rc in the wild. Either we have a beta or 
RC but beta-rc? Wy we don’t use the build number for this or build date? When 
you download the nightly, there is a Long number in the titlebar, I think it 
was the date like NetBeans 9.0-dev-20180101 or smth like that. So why not using 
beta-20180303 and for RC too? So everyone knows, that this rc is the latest 
build or is 3 days old.

My 2 cents


Cheers

Chris

Von: Wade Chandler
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2018 01:41
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Where we are and where we are going with Apache NetBeans 9.0

I don’t like the rc1-rc1 bit. I think once one knows the reason it exists, they 
can understand it, but a release candidate for a release candidate, is just 
hard to say with a straight face IMO. I prefer the rc1-vc1 bit myself. Either 
way, I think folks will ask what it means, but at least the words for the 
shorthand match exactly what it is; voting candidate for a release candidate 
versus RC for an RC. My couple pennies.

Wade

> On May 29, 2018, at 4:15 PM, Antonio <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 0
> 
> I don't see a problem with the "rc1-rc1", "rc1-rc2" approach.
> 
> Cheers,
> Antonio
> 
> On 29/05/18 22:03, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>> We’re going to continue to use the release90 branch.
>> The next — and hopefully last — release candidate before the final release
>> of NB 9.0 will be rc2.
>> We will need to vote on that release in the Apache PPMC and IPMC just like
>> all other releases.
>> There may be a need to vote multiple times, though we’re getting better at
>> putting releases together and so, just like for the rc1, we may only need
>> one round of votes.
>> Anyway, I propose we use the shortened names rc2-vc1, rc2-vc2, rc2-vc3,
>> i.e., ‘vc’ standing for ‘voting candidate’, these would be for an assumed
>> three rounds of Apache voting for the rc2 release, though we’ll probably
>> only need rc2-vc1.
>> That is also the structure suggested by our mentor Bertrand.
>> The rc2 will be the releae on which the NetCAT and beyond Community
>> Acceptance survey will be done.
>> Unless there are objections, I propose we use this structure. If you
>> object, you should provide a counter proposal.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists




Reply via email to