Of course it's good to move fast but things aren't quite predictable in the way people vote.
I didn't occur to me how useful the 'at least 72hours' phrase is, will definitely use it in the future! --emi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On 26 July 2018 4:48 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:20 PM Emilian Bold > [email protected] wrote: > > > .."At least 72hours" sounds useful in retrospect as it's open-ended. But > > otoh I assumed the voting > > window has to be predictable because people might schedule to verify the > > release later on... only > > to find out the voting closed already!... > > Well, if they don't do it within 72 hours they might miss it and > that's fine IMO, it means others have validated the release and found > it good. > > Don't get me wrong, 5 days works as well but we see now that it does > slow down things - probably not an issue for a "big" release like this > one but in general I think it's good to move fast if you can. > > -Bertrand > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
