Hi, Responses inline.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Sebastian Nagel < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 > with a documentation issue about the dependencies: > > > simply copy its HBase core lib from the HBase installation into the > > local/lib directory. This works for me. > Removing lib/hbase-0.90.4.jar and copying hbase-0.94.jar from the HBase > installation > into lib/ caused a > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HColumnDescriptor.setMaxVersions(I)V > Which version of HBase are you using? > I've tested with the official 0.90.4. (Just the one that should be included using ivy.xml). I will check for certain at my workstation tomorrow. > > > After building rc2 with ivy-enabled HBase, it seems a test HBase jar is > > deployed in local/lib, even though it's called hbase-0.90.4.jar. > In my case, it's definitely HBase 0.90.4 > Weird. Do you clean the build properly? I get HBaseConfiguration class not found exceptions after building and running local jobs. (Because it's not in the hbase jar that is). Trying to run Nutch with hbase-0.90.4.jar and HBase 0.94 installed > also failed (see > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-user/201201.mbox/%3CCADcMMgHNTcEzSxEt=boyt5xr-umu4t5qyfeas2lrqubv4_t...@mail.gmail.com%3E > ). > > From the wiki: > > (N.B. Gora 0.2 uses HBase 0.90.4, however the setup is known to work > > with more recent versions of HBase.) > That's right. However for RC testing and for instructions I'd like to use the ivy.xml supplied versions. > We should specify which versions are definitely working when following the > procedure in the tutorial. It's not the user's task to try it out. > > I agree. But again, I like to stick to a single version. It's already pretty darn hard to support a single version of HBase (dependency wise for example), let alone multiple versions. Sebastian > > Thanks, Ferdy. > > On 06/18/2012 12:27 PM, Ferdy Galema wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Tested it with HBase but there is a slight issue with the dependencies. > > After building rc2 with ivy-enabled HBase, it seems a test HBase jar is > > deployed in local/lib, even though it's called hbase-0.90.4.jar. (I do > not > > know yet how this is caused!) But since a user should have a separate > HBase > > installation anyway, I don't think it's a blocker for now. A user should > > simply copy its HBase core lib from the HBase installation into the > > local/lib directory. This works for me. We should add this to > > http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/GORA_HBase (btw does anyone know why I > cannot > > edit this one anymore?) > > > > Crawling/parsing works fine after the workaround, so +1 from me. If > anyone > > disagrees with the above, I'm fine with that too and fixing it prior to > > releasing. > > > > Ferdy > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Julien Nioche < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Lewis > >> > >> The tests still fail but will be fixed with > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1399 and I don't think it > is > >> a blocker. > >> The signatures are fine and the content of the Maven repo looks OK . > >> > >> +1 for releasing > >> > >> Thanks a lot. > >> > >> Julien > >> > >> > >> On 15 June 2012 13:48, lewis john mcgibbney <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Everyone, > >>> > >>> A candidate for the Apache Nutch 2.0 RC2 is available at: > >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-nutch-2.0rc2 > >>> > >>> The release candidate is a src.zip and src.tar.gz ONLY > >>> archive of the sources in: > >>> > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-2.0rc2 > >>> > >>> We release Nutch 2.0 in this fashion due to the inclusion of > >>> Apache Gora and the likelihood that users will regularly recompile > >>> the code to suit dynamic requirements. > >>> > >>> Further, a staged Maven repository of the 2.0 jar, sources.jar and > >>> javadoc.jar is available here: > >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-244/ > >>> > >>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 2.0. > >>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > >>> least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast. > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 2.0 > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > >>> > >>> Many Thanks and heres to plenty more. > >>> > >>> Kind Regards, > >>> Lewis > >>> > >>> P.S. Here's my +1. > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> * > >> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > >> > >> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > >> http://www.digitalpebble.com > >> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble > >> > >> > > > >
