I just modded it through :) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message----- From: Tejas Patil <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, June 2, 2013 10:22 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Nutch 2.2 Release Candidate >+1 from my side too :) > >PS: Am I only one who is getting the mail today after 2 days ? Something >seems wrong with the mail servers. > > >On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:17 PM, lewis john mcgibbney ><[email protected]>wrote: > >> Good Friday Everyone, >> >> Glad to get to a stage where we can VOTE on the release of the Apache >> Nutch 2.2 artifacts. >> >> We solved a stack of issues: >> http://s.apache.org/LPB >> >> SVN source tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-2.2/ >> >> Staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-044/ >> >> Release artifacts: >> http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch/nutch2.2/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using 4E21557F): >> http://nutch.apache.org/dist/KEYS >> >> Vote will be open for at least least 72 hours, however given this >>weather >> I suppose we can all be forgiven if it is not done over the weekend :0) >> >> I would like to say a huge thanks all contributors and committers from >>far >> and wide who helped with this release. It is another milestone for us to >> get here yet again. >> >> Have a great weekend >> >> Lewis >> >> [ ] +1, let's get it released!!! >> [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... >> [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why) >> >> p.s. here's my +1 >> >> >>
