+1 Built and passed all tests with Maven 3, Java 1.7, and linux 3.13.0-35-generic.
Tyler On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Java 7 is A-O-K. No problems there. > > --k > > > On 2014-09-15, at 1:01 PM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey Sean, > > > > Weird on the test - can you try with Java7? I ran and built > > with Java7 and am not sure the tests pass with Java8? > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: <[email protected]> > > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > > Date: Monday, September 15, 2014 8:00 AM > > To: <[email protected]> > > Cc: <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.7 release candidate #1 > > > >> Apache OODT 0.7 RC 1: > >> > >> Signature: confirmed > >> SHA1: matches > >> MD5: matches > >> Python tests: pass > >> Java tests: intermittent failures > >> Also, let's change oodt/agility/setup.py's description to "Apache OODT". > >> > >> The failure seems to be an ordering issue: > >> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> ----- > >> Test set: org.apache.oodt.cas.resource.queuerepo.TestXmlQueueRepository > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> ----- > >> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.249 > sec > >> <<< FAILURE! > >> > testMapping(org.apache.oodt.cas.resource.queuerepo.TestXmlQueueRepository) > >> Time elapsed: 0.224 sec <<< FAILURE! > >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<[test-queue-1, quick]> > >> but was:<[quick, test-queue-1]> > >> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47) > >> at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:280) > >> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64) > >> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:71) > >> at > >> > org.apache.oodt.cas.resource.queuerepo.TestXmlQueueRepository.testMapping( > >> TestXmlQueueRepository.java:64) > >> > >> Probably a quick fix. This is with Java 1.8.0_05. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2014-09-15, at 8:50 AM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Folks, > >>> > >>> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 0.7 release. > >>> The > >>> source code is at: > >>> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ > >>> > >>> For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for > >>> details on > >>> release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the > OODT > >>> release process, documented on the Wiki here: > >>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process > >>> > >>> The release was made from the OODT 0.7 tag (r1624941) at: > >>> > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.7/ > >>> > >>> > >>> A staged Maven repository is available at: > >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1000/ > >>> > >>> > >>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT <version>. The > >>> vote > >>> is > >>> open for the next 72 hours. > >>> > >>> Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check > the > >>> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote > >>> passes > >>> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT <version> > >>> > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> Chris > >>> > >>> P.S. Here is my +1. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
