Aye send it over I'll have a look.

Tom

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey Tom,
>
> I still think a talk on CAS-PGE would be a great one. Like the
> full ins and outs of it. I put in a talk a few years ago on it
> I’ll dig up, but I had to bow out (ApacheCon 2014).
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> Email: [email protected]
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Barber <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, February 8, 2016 at 4:41 AM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: OODT Talk Ideas
>
> >Hello folks,
> >
> >Was thinking about a few titles for talks this year, I was thinking about:
> >
> >Managing Data Management at scale. The general premise being a talk about
> >scaling OODT and also managing the services it provides across the globe,
> >which is something we're tackling with Quarkmatter and useful for people
> >wanting to make use of OODT's distributed-ness.
> >
> >Secondly, I was going to do a usual Data Management 101 for people
> >interested in Data Management but with no real clue, the usual setup and
> >config, what OODT can do to help you etc. I think projects like ours
> >require a talk like this most years for those who haven't a clue, like
> >myself! :)
> >
> >Let me know if anyone has any other ideas that they think would make a
> >great talk but don't want to deliver and I'll figure out what i'm doing
> >before friday.
> >
> >Tom
>
>

Reply via email to