Sounds good mate. grab me here when you can.

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you can believe it or not, I've got a call with Mark Shuttleworth about
> the incubator in about 10 minutes. How about 8pm BST?
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hangout?
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Tom Barber <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Oh and I want to finish off that website template I started and get an
> > > improved and easier to maintain website launched!
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello there folks,
> > > >
> > > > So I figured we might as well start a discussion about what we'd like
> > > OODT
> > > > 2.0 to look like.
> > > >
> > > > Personally I think there is a big bu0nch of cool stuff we could bring
> > to
> > > > the platform that would extend and modernise it with minimal(ish)
> > effort.
> > > >
> > > > Personal Priority:
> > > >
> > > >    - Merging the long lost Avro implementation to rid us of XMLRPC :)
> > > >    - Implement a Kafka pipeline under the hood for internal message
> > > >    passing
> > > >    - I mentioned this on the list a couple of weeks ago,
> implementing a
> > > >        message pub/sub platform would allow for multiple components
> to
> > > subscribe
> > > >       to a stream very easily, also it would allow us to persist
> > > messages for
> > > >       audit purposes, giving users traceability within the platform.
> > > >    - Revamp OpsUI with a Hue style interface
> > > >    - if you've never used Hue, personally, its what I believe Ops UI
> > for
> > > >        OODT 2.0 should reflect (http://demo.gethue.com/) a central
> > place
> > > >       where people can adminster a lot of the common functionality of
> > > the system
> > > >       without dropping down into weird scripts etc, and just nice and
> > > user
> > > >       friendly.
> > > >    - Integrate new Curator tool
> > > >    - We have a new curator tool written by Mike Starch, its a great
> way
> > > >       of ingesting data graphically and we'll look at getting it into
> > > OODT shortly
> > > >    - Horizontal scale out capabilities
> > > >    - Again, going back to a requirement I had earlier in the year, in
> > my
> > > >       case specifically around File Manager, but it should work
> across
> > > the board,
> > > >       adding more file managers in different locations should work
> well
> > > and
> > > >       scale out nicely without any scripting or hacks to make it
> work.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nice to haves:
> > > >
> > > >    - Improved workflows with CommonWL and other workflow additions
> > > >    - Integrating with other workflows would be cool and help bring
> in a
> > > >       more diverse userbase.
> > > >    - Much improved REST interfaces
> > > >    - Lets rid ourselves of Wicket and get some proper REST stuff in
> > that
> > > >       allows users to create new UI's easily and modify existing UI's
> > to
> > > fit a
> > > >       purpose. Of course  REST interfaces can be hit programattically
> > > and by non
> > > >       Java based programs which benifits other people.
> > > >    - Depreciate of older modules
> > > >    - There's a lot of  stuff in OODT, lets give it a spring clean!
> > > >    - Centralised Config with Gossip/Zookeeper
> > > >    - Sort of in line with the horizontal scale, but to make it really
> > > >       seamless, it would be great to use Gossip or ZK to centralise
> > > >       configurations so that when new nodes are added everyone is
> > aware,
> > > or when
> > > >       stuff fails, leader election etc!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thats my list off the top of my head, there will certainly be more,
> > add
> > > > your own and we'll try and come up with a roadmap.
> > > >
> > > > I'm very interested to hear from users like Val, who have a more
> > > objective
> > > > opinion of OODT :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Tom
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Lewis*
> >
>



-- 
*Lewis*

Reply via email to