There you go, running commentary over. The filemanager test suite now passes on Lucene 6, I'll fix up the rest next week.
Tom On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > Better than I thought actually: > > Tests in error: > TestLuceneQueryCliAction.testClientTransTrueAndFlatProduct:78 » > CmdLineAction ... > TestFileManagerCli.testLuceneQuery:350 » Runtime > org.apache.oodt.cas.cli.excep... > > Tests run: 221, Failures: 1, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0 > > The failure is actually one Avro. So only 2 failing on lucene 6 in the FM. > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Just FYI: >> >> Doesn't work yet, but I've pushed a lucene branch which is based on 2.0 >> and upgrades lucene to 6.1.0. LuceneCatalog in filemanager has been 75% >> (guess) converted and tests are half passing. >> >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ACK >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Once avro_rpc is stable, I suggest we rename the branch 2.0-dev or >>> similar >>> > then branch the branch to uprade solr and lucene outside of that scope >>> so >>> > we don't destroy the semi working avro upgrades ;) >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Coolio! >>> > > >>> > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Yes I was just telling Paul R. the other day we need to do >>> > >> this, or we’re DOA. I’ve first hand seen the scalability >>> > >> issues with Big Translate and DRAT using the old Lucene >>> > >> library. Let’s get it fixed in 2.x. >>> > >> >>> > >> Cheers, >>> > >> Chris >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Tom Barber" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> >Just throwing this one out there as we're making a bunch of >>> breaking >>> > >> >changes in 2.0. >>> > >> > >>> > >> >Is it worth upgrading Lucene and Solr versions within OODT? >>> > >> > >>> > >> >My feeling is that they are both pretty old and whilst we're making >>> > life >>> > >> >hard for everyone we might as well go the whole hog and drag them >>> into >>> > >> the >>> > >> >21st century, but I'm interested in others opinions. >>> > >> > >>> > >> >Chris you have a much better understand about those things than >>> myself. >>> > >> > >>> > >> >Tom >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Lewis* >>> >> >> >
