[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17622924#comment-17622924
 ] 

jiangjiguang0719 commented on PARQUET-2159:
-------------------------------------------

[~theosib-amazon]  As you mentioned above "compile-time generated code that 
makes debugging a huge pain".   And current different computing engines support 
different java versions (e.g.  presto supports java8,  trino supports java17,  
spark supports java17 and flink supports java11), so I have two option 
suggestion:
1、Upgrade parquet-mr to java17(java 17 is lts), and generate different things 
depending on the compiler's java source version setting.
2、Create a new Java project as library to support java17 parquet bit-packing 
de/encode opt.  without  generating code.

> Parquet bit-packing de/encode optimization
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PARQUET-2159
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2159
>             Project: Parquet
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: parquet-mr
>    Affects Versions: 1.13.0
>            Reporter: Fang-Xie
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.13.0
>
>         Attachments: image-2022-06-15-22-56-08-396.png, 
> image-2022-06-15-22-57-15-964.png, image-2022-06-15-22-58-01-442.png, 
> image-2022-06-15-22-58-40-704.png
>
>
> Current Spark use Parquet-mr as parquet reader/writer library, but the 
> built-in bit-packing en/decode is not efficient enough. 
> Our optimization for Parquet bit-packing en/decode with jdk.incubator.vector 
> in Open JDK18 brings prominent performance improvement.
> Due to Vector API is added to OpenJDK since 16, So this optimization request 
> JDK16 or higher.
> *Below are our test results*
> Functional test is based on open-source parquet-mr Bit-pack decoding 
> function: *_public final void unpack8Values(final byte[] in, final int inPos, 
> final int[] out, final int outPos)_* __
> compared with our implementation with vector API *_public final void 
> unpack8Values_vec(final byte[] in, final int inPos, final int[] out, final 
> int outPos)_*
> We tested 10 pairs (open source parquet bit unpacking vs ours optimized 
> vectorized SIMD implementation) decode function with bit 
> width=\{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}, below are test results:
> !image-2022-06-15-22-56-08-396.png|width=437,height=223!
> We integrated our bit-packing decode implementation into parquet-mr, tested 
> the parquet batch reader ability from Spark VectorizedParquetRecordReader 
> which get parquet column data by the batch way. We construct parquet file 
> with different row count and column count, the column data type is Int32, the 
> maximum int value is 127 which satisfies bit pack encode with bit width=7,   
> the count of the row is from 10k to 100 million and the count of the column 
> is from 1 to 4.
> !image-2022-06-15-22-57-15-964.png|width=453,height=229!
> !image-2022-06-15-22-58-01-442.png|width=439,height=217!
> !image-2022-06-15-22-58-40-704.png|width=415,height=208!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to