Hi,
why do we not call perl's cleanup at child exit?
Here my setup:
<Perl>
package My::Test;
use strict;
use warnings;
sub new {
my (undef, $data)=...@_;
my $inst=bless \$data;
warn "$$: a new instance is born: $inst ($$inst)\n";
$inst;
}
sub DESTROY {warn "$$: DESTROY $_[0] (${$_[0]})\n"}
$My::PInstance=My::Test->new('parent');
</Perl>
PerlChildInitHandler "sub {$My::CInstance=My::Test->new('child')}"
The destructor is called only once for $My::PInstance at server
shutdown. This may be questionably right because if the object is
created in the parent process so it is destroyed there and only there.
But the $My::CInstance destructor is never called.
Of course I can add a PerlChildExitHandler
PerlChildExitHandler \
"sub {undef $_ for($My::PInstance, $My::CInstance)}"
or an END block
<Perl>
END {undef $_ for($My::PInstance, $My::CInstance)}
</Perl>
Both are called at child shutdown. But that is a bit counter-intuitive
since:
perl -e '{
package My::Test;
use strict;
use warnings;
sub new {
my (undef, $data)=...@_;
my $inst=bless \$data;
warn "$$: a new instance is born: $inst ($$inst)\n";
$inst;
}
sub DESTROY {
warn "$$: DESTROY $_[0] (${$_[0]})\n";
}
}
$My::PInstance=My::Test->new("parent");fork;'
8982: a new instance is born: My::Test=SCALAR(0x7c79b8) (parent)
8982: DESTROY My::Test=SCALAR(0x7c79b8) (parent)
8983: DESTROY My::Test=SCALAR(0x7c79b8) (parent)
And then we have $r->child_terminate which simply calls exit() at
C-level in a request pool cleanup. So, no perl-level cleanup at all is
done.
Do you think this is the right behavior? If not, what do you think would
be correct?
Torsten
--
Need professional mod_perl support?
Just hire me: torsten.foert...@gmx.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org
