I guess my question is how would this be any different from what we're doing now? Is anyone actively working on mod_perl 1 development, except when a security issue is raised?
- Perrin On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Philip M. Gollucci <pgollu...@p6m7g8.com> wrote: > In 2010, httpd 1.3.x official went EOL. > > In February 2011, the httpd 1.3.x binaries moved officially to > archive.apache.org. > > I think its finally time we do the same thing for mod_perl 1.3.x and > dedicate 100% of our resources to 2.0.x/2.2.x. > > I'll leave 5 days for comments. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C > Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 > VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation > Committer, FreeBSD Foundation > Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. > Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. > > Work like you don't need the money, > love like you'll never get hurt, > and dance like nobody's watching. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org
