Good question. I suppose we would want to keep the dtds out on the
site if just to support older (broken?) tools and containers.
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 13, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
From: James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Did you mean struts.apache.org -> shale.apache.org?
If not, I'm not sure what you mean.
Yea, that's what I meant. Do you think we need a dtds and schema
folders under the shale site, or just a dtds folder. With the
DTD's loaded from the classpath we might not even need to publish
them on the web site.
shale.apache.org/dtds
I have one XSD that I could publish for clay html namespace
support. In the future, we might have a couple more for Clay's
version of the core and html schema. The clay markup parser is not
validating so these would only be needed for tool support.
Gary
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 13, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
Any objection to changing the namesapces for Shale resources?
http://struts.apache.org/shale/core
http://struts.apache.org/dtds/shale-dialog-config_1_0.dtd
http://struts.apache.org/shale/clay-plugin
http://struts.apache.org/dtds/shale-clay-config_1_0.dtd
http://struts.apache.org/shale/clay-plugin/html
Gary
