Well I had in the past that AbstractJMockJsfTestCase name, but I changed it because you asked. or did I got you wrong in only addind that class (with JMock in its name) to that package...
I'll rename that class tonight. -Matthias On 7/19/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/19/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From SHALE-210 we have a second class named AbstractJsfTestCase. It's > in a separate (jmock) package. > > I'm trying to compare this to having > > org.apache.struts.action.ActionForm and > org.apache.struts.validator.ActionForm (instead of ValidatorForm) > > but it's not quite the same, since the jMock test case doesn't extend > the other one. I agree that two different names would be better. Matthias? Craig Wouldn't AbstractJmockJsfTestCase be more descriptive? I think > shale-test having two classes with the same name is confusing. > > Thanks, > Wendy >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
