On 7/31/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I won't be able to look into this deeply until tonight, but the comment > about Hypersonic makes me think we might have a second license issue to deal > with on this application. You might want to think about using Derby for the > back end instead. That's what my JPA based example uses. I'll have to look into what you did. Does Derby provide an in-memory db option? That's what I'm looking for ...
Yes it does have an in-memory mode. Indeed, shale-sql-browser uses Derby in this way. Craig
Craig Sean
