On 8/3/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mine is [EMAIL PROTECTED], but please don't make me the owner -- too much responsibility. Unless 'owner' is the same as committer?
The only difference between project owner and project member is access to the admin screens for the project itself. Both have commit rights. I'll set you as a member if you want just that. --
James Mitchell 678.910.8017
Craig On Aug 3, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> +1. I was wanting to figure out what all that google open source >> stuff was about anyway. But I'm cool with either google or java.net. > > > I just set up "shale-goodies" for us at Google[1]. Note that you > must have > a GMail account to log in with for SVN access, but that's already > true for a > bunch of us. Send me your GMail username and I'll add you in as a > project > owner. > > Greg > > > Craig > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies/ > > > On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Sean Schofield wrote: >> >> > I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving >> this >> > to google's new open source area. While I understand the >> reasons for >> > the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to >> host a >> > fully functional sample app using several different technologies. >> > >> > On google (and presumably dev.java.net), we can also distribute >> > binaries wither hibernate, etc. That will allow more people to use >> > the app. No matter how easy you make it, some people are just >> putoff >> > by compiling their own source. I admit, sometimes I fall into this >> > category (if my interest is only casual.) >> > >> > If we do move it, I'd still like some loose integration between >> shale >> > and this project. This would include links to the shale- >> petstore from >> > the shale site and referring people on the user list to the >> > shale-petstore when it serves as an appropriate example. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > Sean >> > >> > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License, >> >> Version >> >> > > 1.2. What about the text? Any ideas on that? >> >> > >> >> > Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia? There's a notice at >> >> the >> >> > bottom of every page: "All text is available under the terms >> of the >> >> > GNU Free Documentation License." >> >> > >> >> > As for whether we can use the text or images, if GFDL is not >> >> listed on >> >> > Cliff's page [1] then I would ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> I suspect the GNU license for docs will have issues, so asking on >> >> legal-discuss would be a good idea. >> >> >> >> In the mean time, note that the original Blueprints PetStore >> >> application >> >> (including content and images) is BSD-licensed, so we can use >> >> stuff from >> >> there. <https://blueprints.dev.java.net>) >> >> >> >> Craig >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Wendy >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >>
