I think I prefer that too. shale.org doesn't appeal to me for some reason I can't really put my finger on.

Greg

On Aug 4, 2006, at 2:03 PM, James Mitchell wrote:

I prefer com.google.shalegoodies

Your thoughts?



--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017




On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:

> Lets think on the package names a bit.


OK.

What about just org.shale? So for petstore we have org.shale.petstore
as the package name with org.shale as the maven group name.

Craig

Sean



Reply via email to