On 8/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Mon Aug 28 16:52:23 2006
New Revision: 437881

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437881&view=rev
Log:
Skeleton of support for Jakarta Commons SCXML as a state machine using
the shale-dialog2 abstraction APIs.  I got distracted by refactoring the
legacy state machine support so there isn't any meat here yet ... but
that will be the next step.

SHALE-10 SHALE-48 SHALE-61


Added:
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/pom.xml
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/java/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/java/org/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/java/org/apache/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog2/
    
shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog2/scxml/
    
shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog2/scxml/ScxmlContext.java
    
shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog2/scxml/ScxmlContexts.java
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/resources/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/resources/META-INF/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/resources/META-INF/LICENSE.txt
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.txt
    
shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/test/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/test/java/
    shale/sandbox/shale-dialog2-scxml/src/test/resources/

<snip/>

Craig (or anyone else who can) -

Was trying to get these sources, seem to be missing props (new
client?). I particularly care about eol-style and keywords. Please
add. Thanks!

In addition to this commit (r437881), the earlier two are affected as
well {r437880,r437879}.

-Rahul

Reply via email to