> >> BTW, I'm going to take a try at moving commons valiator out of the core. > > I might need some help with the clean up. Does "shale-commons-validator" > > sound ok for the project under "framework"? > > > I'd think shale-validator would be better, unless we contemplate alternative > validation strategies. >
That name would also work if we wanted to add other types of validators to the project. I almost had this done and realized that we really need to change the package names. I started moving the validator stuff out into corresponding packages but realized that that wouldn't work for "resources/Bundle.properties". What about moving these packages under "validator". shale/component shale/resource shale/taglib shale/renderer shale/faces shale/view shale/validator/component shale/validator/resource shale/validator/taglib shale/validator/renderer shale/validator/faces shale/validator/view Any thoughts? > >> Gary > > > Craig > Gary
