Hi Craig! Please be patience with me, maybe I'll get better after having a coffee ...
>> >> You do NOT have to scan all classes. Thats the point. > > Your patch, including the embedded comments, is completely opaque on this > question. This is due to the fact that the patch was not meant to be a solution for the mailing list discussion. > You haven't answered my repeated requests to explain *what* this > patch is supposed to do Take jars into account which have a faces-config.xml in another place than META-INF/faces-config.xml. Not by scanning all jars, but by using getResource() (as in expliciteResource() ) with the path taken from CONFIG_FILES I thought this patch is easy and without any side effect. THEN, I wanted to start a discussion about how to find a different style to get the list of classes to scan. Maybe with the conclusion that we don't want to have it. Ciao, Mario
