On 10/18/06, David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I plan to work on the home page, but I won't get much done until I get off
the road for awhile, which will be in a couple of weeks.

<snip/>

Great, you'll probably find a short description blurb (not more than
2-3 sentences--I'll try to take in the feedback from this thread) once
I'm done with the items (below). Please feel free to
delete/improve/adjust it as you see fit when you get a chance.

Thanks,
-Rahul


If not working on it, I've been thinking about the homepage lately, and it
strikes me that I don't really know how to spin Shale. We have so many
unrelated features that it's difficult to say "Shale is...". The addition of
JPA makes things even murkier. Are we one-stop shopping for JSF? Proving
ground for JSF 2.0? I know we're a set of services, but that's a rather
bland description.


david

2006/10/18, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 10/18/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/25/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Someone on IRC brought up a good point about the Shale home page:  We
> > > don't say what Shale *is* until 1/3 of the way down the page.
> > >
> > > I think the information in the paragraph that starts "Thus, Shale
> > > is..." belongs up at the top of the page.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?  Volunteers to fix it? :)
> > >
> > <snip/>
> >
> > We really need to do this. I plan to make some changes as time permits
> > (probably next week):
> >
> > * Remove logo bit from home page
> > * Move the historical out to its own page
> > * Try to add features-* pages content to the site sections of their
> > own modules (for example, the description in the dialog module site -
> > thanks Craig - is much more accurate and upto date that the
> > corresponding features page)
> > * Point to module sites rather than features-* where feasible
> > * Move download and documentation (which is really Javadocs) sections
> > to their own pages
> > * The mailing lists and issue tracking blurbs on home page can go
> > IMO, redundant given the LHS menu contains the links (need to add ML
> > link)
>
>
> Thanks Rahul ... +1 on all of these.
>
> One additional note on the "features" sections.  With the way things are
> now
> spread out into submodules, I think we'll be able to completely get rid of
> these by the time we're done, because the information will have been
> distributed onto the submodule pages already.  But, we'll also want to
> make
> sure that the submodule list is up to date in every website (IIRC it is
> manually maintained via cut-n-paste) to reflect the new additions.
>
> As for me, I'm planning on finishing up the main page for shale-dialog,
> and
> adding the rest of the stuff from features-dialog to the
> shale-dialog-basic
> page, in the next couple of days.
>
> And then some new content, hopefully soon.
> >
> > -Rahul
>
>
> Craig
>
>
> > --
> > > Wendy
> > >
> >
>
>


Reply via email to