Yeah, that's weird. Especially if you google search "Sun proprietary/confidential CDDL". Myfaces is using the same DTD here [1]?
You should ask someone in licensing at apache. Maybe you can get an answer in less time [2]. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/examples/simple/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/examples-config.xml?view=markup [2] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-444 Gary -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Forwarding to the Shale project, which has the same issue: > > http://tinyurl.com/28e558 > > Niall > > On 6/21/07, Craig L Russell wrote: > > I've been working with Sun to get the appropriate legal notices > > changed in the relevant files: the xsd for faces 1.2 and the dtd for > > faces 1.0 and 1.1. > > > > Please take a look at the newly updated files at: > > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_1_2.xsd > > http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd > > http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd > > > > The notices in these files should be self-explanatory. The files in > > the faces repository should be refreshed with the latest versions > > from the web. The NOTICE file in the distribution should be updated > > to reflect the CDDL license (we don't want the GPL license option do > > we). > > > > If there are other similar cases, please let me know and I'll try to > > get them updated as well. > > > > Regards, > > > > Craig > > > > On May 21, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > > Does anyone here besides me see a problem with this copyright: > > > > > > > > > > > > appearing in these two files? > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/ > > > resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd? > > > view=markup > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/ > > > resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd? > > > revision=374886&view=markup > > > > > > These two DTDs are part of the JSR 127 spec, so they should not be > > > Sun proprietary/confidential. Maybe the comments are proprietary/ > > > confidential? Am I wrong for being annoyed that someone with > > > commit privs project would check files into an ASF repo with this > > > copyright statement, regardless of the technical justification? > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational > > > only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not > > > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions > > > and policies of the ASF. See for > > > official ASF policies and documents. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Craig Russell > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > > > >
