[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15389657#comment-15389657
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on SLING-5891:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user ghenzler opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/sling/pull/158

    SLING-5891 Provide compatibility for oak 1.2-1.5

    
    Sorry for the formatting noise  (now it is all spaces). 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ghenzler/sling SLING-5891-oak14-compatibility

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/sling/pull/158.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #158
    
----
commit 165cafb1d3ce907718d2136a148eb545033b2ecf
Author: georg.henzler <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-07-22T15:03:14Z

    SLING-5891 Provide compatibility for oak 1.2-1.5

----


> Make oak restrictions compatible to oak > 1.2
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-5891
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5891
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Georg Henzler
>            Assignee: Robert Munteanu
>
> The initial version was tested with oak-core v1.2.7, however some users might 
> want to use it with more recent versions (especially 1.4.x). 
> The problematic packages are {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api}} and 
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.util}}. Usually it is not a good idea to tweak 
> package imports manually, but I think for this particular case there is no 
> other solution to provide compatibility across oak versions. The 
> functionality that is actually used from those two packages is also very 
> basic (Tree, Type, PropertyState and TreeUtil), therefore providing a version 
> range for them is not problematic IMHO.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to