Similar as others, will be interested in working out api's and details but
overall in favor of it.
+1
Tom Graves
On Monday, March 11, 2024 at 11:25:38 AM CDT, Mridul Muralidharan
<[email protected]> wrote:
I am supportive of the proposal - this is a step in the right direction
!Additional metadata (explicit and inferred) for log records, and exposing them
for indexing is extremely useful.
The specifics of the API still need some work IMO and does not need to be this
disruptive, but I consider that is orthogonal to this vote itself - and
something we need to iterate upon during PR reviews.
+1
Regards,Mridul
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:09 AM Mich Talebzadeh <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1
Mich Talebzadeh,Dad | Technologist | Solutions Architect | Engineer
London
United Kingdom
view my Linkedin profile
https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh
Disclaimer: The information provided is correct to the best of my knowledge but
of course cannot be guaranteed . It is essential to note that, as with any
advice, quote "one test result is worth one-thousand expert opinions (Werner
Von Braun)".
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 09:27, Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 18:11, yangjie01 <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
Jie Yang
发件人:Haejoon Lee <[email protected]>
日期:2024年3月11日星期一 17:09
收件人:Gengliang Wang <[email protected]>
抄送:dev <[email protected]>
主题:Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Structured Logging Framework for Apache Spark
+1
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:36 AM Gengliang Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Structured Logging Framework for Apache
Spark
References:
- JIRA ticket
- SPIP doc
- Discussion thread
Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
Thanks!
Gengliang Wang
